Canadian Court Did Not Declare APC A Terrorist Organisation – Morka

All Progressives Congress (APC) has clarified viral report that a Canadian court declared the party a terrorist organisation.

Gatekeepers News reports that in a press statement signed by National Publicity Secretary Felix Morka, the party denied the claims, stating that the Canadian court made no such declaration.

According to Morka, the report stemmed from a case involving Douglas Egharevba and the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, where the applicant’s membership in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) was the focus, not the APC. The court dismissed Egharevba’s application for judicial review due to his alleged involvement in subversive acts as a PDP member.

The APC noted that the only mention of the party in the court’s 16-page decision was in the background section, where the applicant falsely claimed to have been an APC member since 2007, despite the party’s registration in 2013.

Morka emphasised that the court did not make any determination on terrorism, as the judge explicitly stated that analysing the findings on terrorism was unnecessary given the dismissal of the application on other grounds.

The APC has urged its supporters and Nigerians to disregard the false reports, warning that spreading such misinformation could be malicious.

Read full statement below:

Canadian Court Did Not Declare APC A Terrorist Organisation – Morka

CANADIAN COURT DID NOT DECLARE APC A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION

The attention of the All Progressives Congress (APC) has been drawn to media reports about a decision of a Canadian Court allegedly declared APC as a terrorist organisation.

We wish to state categorically that the Canadian court did not declare APC as a terrorist organisation, contrary to highly erroneous media reports in circulation.

As reported, the declaration was allegedly made in the case of Douglas Egharevba and the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, in which the Applicant (Douglas Egharevba) sought judicial review of a decision by the Canadian Immigration Appeal Division [IAD] which determined that the Applicant was inadmissible in Canada under its Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA).

In a decision in the matter dated June 17, 2025, Judge Phuong T.V. Ngo dismissed the application for judicial review on the ground that the Applicant was a member of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and that the PDP was an organization engaged in acts of subversion pursuant to paragraph 34(1)(b.1) of the IRPA making him inadmissible in Canada.

In his analysis, the Judge stated, “As such, applying the reasonableness standard of review, I cannot find the IAD’s conclusion that the Elections in question constituted a democratic process or institution and that the PDP, its members and supporters engaged in subversive acts committed against the electoral process for the improper purpose of maintaining political power to be unreasonable.”

To be clear, the only reference to APC in the entire 16-paged decision was in the introductory “Background”, Paragraph 4, where the court referenced a “Background Declaration Form in which the Applicant stated that “he was a member of the People’s Democratic Party [PDP] of Nigeria from December 1999 until December 2007, and a member of All Progressives Congress [APC] party of Nigeria from December 2007 until May 2017.”

For the record, APC was not in existence as of 2007. The Party was registered in 2013. The Applicant’s claim of membership of APC as of 2007 is evidently false as he could not have been a member of APC that didn’t exist at the time.

For the avoidance of doubt, we make bold to state that the court never made any determination on the question of terrorism in its decision. In the Judge’s own words:

“Having found that the IAD’s analysis on subversion was reasonable, this is sufficient to dismiss the application for review. *I will therefore refrain from anaylyzing the IAD’s findings on terrorism.”*

Clearly, reports that APC was declared as a terrorist organization by the Canadian court in this matter is patently erroneous, if not mischievous.

The court did not make such a declaration, and could not have done so as that would be an unjustifiable overreach, and a major breach of fair hearing, among other due process rights, given that APC was not a party to the proceedings. Such a decision would also have been of absolute irrelevance as being made without jurisdiction, and of no extraterritorial applicability or significance.

We urge our Party faithful, supporters and all Nigerians to disregard the reports as false and misleading.

Signed:
Felix Morka, CON
National Publicity Secretary
All Progressives Congress (APC)