Progress in complex health institutions is best assessed through facts, context, and measurable outcomes. At the University of Benin Teaching Hospital (UBTH), recent reforms and structural decisions must be understood within the realities the institution inherited and the urgent need to safeguard patient care, financial stability, and service continuity. Under the leadership of *Professor Idia Nibokun Ize-Iyamu,* these reforms have been deliberate, strategic, and patient-focused.
It is important to clarify that Sudabelt was brought into the hospital during the tenure of former CMD Professor Darlington Obaseki E. at a time when UBTH’s dialysis programme was nearly grounded due to severe shortages of reagents and consumables. The dialysis unit, which provides life-sustaining treatment for patients with renal failure, was facing operational paralysis. The intervention at the time was aimed at preventing service collapse. Likewise, Ginos was contracted during that same period and allocated space within the hospital premises. These arrangements predate the current administration. However, the present management under Professor Ize-Iyamu reviewed and allowed their continued operation because they were considered innovative and consistent with the UBTH-CARES agenda of the current administration, which emphasizes Clinical Excellence, Accountability, Revenue Protection, Efficiency, and Sustainability.
The adjustments in service costs seen today reflect broader economic realities. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, global supply chains have experienced disruption, while inflation and currency fluctuations have significantly increased the cost of medical consumables and equipment. Tertiary institutions like UBTH cannot operate in isolation from these economic pressures. What has distinguished the current administration is not the introduction of hardship, but the implementation of structured systems to ensure sustainability and accountability despite these pressures.
One of the most impactful reforms under Professor Ize-Iyamu’s leadership is the establishment of the Quality Laboratory. This initiative was not arbitrary; *it was a response to serious institutional challenges that previously led to operational, financial, and clinical setbacks.*
There was a period when laboratory services experienced disruptions, including the locking up of the blood bank, which resulted in preserved blood units expiring and being wasted. Such losses were not merely financial-they affected patient care and undermined the hospital’s efficiency. Additionally, there were instances where patients and even staff were unable to access timely laboratory investigations due to refusals to conduct tests. *Reports also indicated that some patients and samples were being redirected to private laboratories outside UBTH, resulting in revenue leakage and weakening the hospital’s service delivery framework.*
*The establishment of the Quality Laboratory directly addresses these systemic vulnerabilities. It ensures uninterrupted diagnostic services, promotes swift turnaround times, and safeguards internally generated revenue that is critical for hospital operations.* By strengthening in-house laboratory capacity, the hospital protects both its financial integrity and its core mandate.
Importantly, the Quality Laboratory is designed to be affordable and patient-centered. Its pricing structure reflects sensitivity to patients’ realities while maintaining high standards of diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. *The goal is not commercialization but consolidation-ensuring that UBTH fulfills its primary mandate: providing comprehensive, quality, and accessible tertiary healthcare.*
The Quality Laboratory now operates alongside the other laboratories within the hospital following the return of the scientists to their duties. Its continued existence is intentional and strategic. It serves as a stabilizing structure to prevent a recurrence of past disruptions, safeguard essential services, and protect patients from avoidable clinical risks. It stands as a proactive safeguard-ensuring that diagnostic services can never again be paralyzed in a manner that leads to financial loss, clinical compromise, or preventable fatalities.
*Patients are not coerced to use any particular laboratory. They are free to choose any of the laboratories within the hospital for their investigations, and they retain the autonomy to decide where their tests are conducted.* However, patients are appropriately educated and encouraged *to resist undue pressure to take samples or conduct investigations outside UBTH when equivalent services are readily available within the institution.* This approach protects patients from unnecessary external costs, ensures quality control, and preserves institutional integrity.
Early outcomes have been encouraging. Turnaround times have improved, diagnostic access has stabilized, and service reliability has increased. The laboratory reform supports clinicians in making timely decisions, enhances patient safety, and reinforces institutional accountability.
Healthcare institutions thrive when systems are strengthened, not when inefficiencies are allowed to persist. Under Professor Idia Nibokun Ize-Iyamu’s leadership, UBTH is aligning operations with global best practices-prioritizing transparency, sustainability, and patient-centered excellence.
The reforms underway are not merely administrative adjustments; they are structural reinforcements designed to protect lives, preserve institutional resources, and secure the future of one of Nigeria’s foremost tertiary hospitals. *In this regard, the vision guiding UBTH today is clear: strengthen systems, safeguard services, and place patients at the center of every decision.*
Gatekeepers News is not liable for opinions expressed in this article; they’re strictly the writer’s
