News

JUST IN: Supreme Court Strikes Out Buhari’s Suit Challenging Electoral Act

The Supreme Court has struck out President Muhammadu Buhari and the Attorney General of the Federation’s suit challenging Section 84(12) of the Electoral Act.

Gatekeepers News reports that the case was expunged on the grounds that it lacks the jurisdiction to entertain the suit and is an abuse of court process.

In a unanimous judgement delivered by Justice Emmanuel Agim the court said allowing the suit to have it’s way will amount to approbating and reprobating at the same time and no court of law shall allow that.

The Apex Court unanimously agreed that President Buhari lacked the jurisdiction to bring the suit before it because of the nature of the reliefs sought.

Earlier, a notice for the judgment delivery was served on President Buhari and the National Assembly on Thursday, inviting them to appear before the court today for the judgment.

The President and his Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, had filed a suit at the Supreme Court, seeking an interpretation of the controversial clause in the Electoral Amendment Act 2022.

In the suit filed on April 29, Buhari and Malami, who are the plaintiffs, listed the National Assembly as the sole defendant.

There have been several debates regarding Section 84(12) of the amended Electoral Act 2022 which was assented to in February.

Upon assenting to the act, President Buhari had asked the National Assembly to delete the contended clause, however, the parliament declined the president’s request.

Section 84 (12) of the legislation holds that, “no political appointee at any level shall be a voting delegate or be voted for at the convention or congress of any political party for the purpose of the nomination of candidates for any election.”

In their suit marked SC/CV/504/2022 and filed on April 29, 2022, President Buhari and Malami sought an order of the apex court to strike out the section of the Electoral Act, which they argue was inconsistent with the nation’s constitution.

According to the court document, the plaintiffs contend that the Section 84(12) of the Electoral (Amendment) Act, 2022 is inconsistent with the provisions of sections 42, 65, 66, 106, 107, 131, 137, 147, 151, 177, 182, 192 and 196 of the Constitution of Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, (as amended), as well Article 2 of the African Charter on Human and People and Peoples Rights.

Uthman Olamilekan Bagbansoro

Recent Posts

Actress Shan George Cries For Help After Her Bank Account Was Hacked

Veteran Nollywood actress, Shan George reported that her personal savings was cleared from her bank…

2 hours ago

SEC Chief To Meet Crypto Exchanges Over Regulation

Dr Emomotimi Agama, the newly appointed Director General, Securities and Exchange Commission, will meet with…

2 hours ago

Fitch Revises Nigeria’s Outlook From Stable To Positive

Fitch, the globally recognized credit rating agency, has revised Nigeria's long-term credit default rating from…

2 hours ago

Newspaper Headlines: Five Things You Need To Know This Morning

Newspaper Headlines: Five Things You Need To Know This Morning Dollar To Naira Exchange Rate…

7 hours ago

Recruitment: Apply For PepsiCo Recruitment 2024

Recruitment, apply for PepsiCo company recruitment 2024 below. Gatekeepers News reports that PepsiCo company is made up of…

9 hours ago

Matawalle’s Alleged N70bn Fraud Case Still Open – EFCC

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has declared that it will proceed with the…

9 hours ago