Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Michigan Supreme Court Rejects Bid To Remove Trump From 2024 Ballot

Donald Trump

In a significant decision, the Michigan Supreme Court has dismissed a bid to remove former President Donald Trump from the 2024 ballot.

Gatekeepers News reports that the challenge, based on the “insurrectionist ban” and Trump’s role in the Capitol riot, contrasts with the recent Colorado Supreme Court ruling.

The Colorado Supreme Court had removed Trump from its primary ballot due to his involvement in the riot.

That decision has however, been put on hold pending appeal.

The Michigan case was rejected on procedural grounds, emphasising the absence of a Michigan law requiring candidates to affirm their legal qualification for the presidency.

The conflicting rulings between Michigan and Colorado set the stage for a potentially pivotal scenario, potentially leading to the US Supreme Court, especially with the upcoming 2024 primaries.

Unlike the Colorado case, the Michigan lawsuit never reached trial and was dismissed early on in the legal process. The decision to dismiss on procedural grounds was upheld by an intermediate appeals court.

The Michigan Court of Claims judge who initially heard the case argued that state law doesn’t empower election officials to assess the eligibility of presidential primary candidates. He also contended that the issue raised by the case constitutes a political question unsuitable for judicial resolution.

Affirming this, the Michigan Court of Appeals stated: “At present, the only imminent event is the presidential primary election. Whether Trump is disqualified is irrelevant to his placement on that specific ballot.”

The Michigan Supreme Court’s recent ruling was not attributed to any specific judge and was released without disclosing the vote count.

The key difference between the Michigan and Colorado outcomes lies in the procedural basis of rejection. Unlike the Colorado courts, Michigan courts never deliberated on whether the January 6 events constituted an insurrection or whether Trump participated in such an act.

Justice Elizabeth Welch of the Michigan Supreme Court highlighted the distinction between Michigan and Colorado laws. She said: “The challengers in Michigan haven’t identified a similar provision in the Michigan Election Law that requires a presidential candidate to affirm their legal qualification for the office,” comparing Michigan law to Colorado’s election code.

The Michigan lawsuit was filed in September by Free Speech For People, an advocacy organisation, on behalf of a group of voters. This group also pursued unsuccessful 14th Amendment challenges against Trump in Minnesota and recently initiated a new case in Oregon. Conversely, the Colorado lawsuit was filed by a separate liberal-leaning group.

You May Also Like


US District Judge Aileen Cannon has dismissed the charges against former President Donald Trump and his two codefendants in a case related to the...


President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has condemned an assassination attempt on former US President, Donald Trump, describing the attack as distasteful. Gatekeepers News reports that...


United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has identified the gunman who shot at the former President of the United States, Donald Trump during...


An assassination attempt occurred at former President of United States, Donald Trump’s campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on Saturday. Gatekeepers News reports that Trump...