Chris Okafor Questions Allegations By Doris Ogala – Says Claims Don’t Add Up

Pastor Chris Okafor, founder of Mountain of Liberation and Miracle Ministry, has publicly challenged a series of accusations made against him by Nollywood actress Doris Ogala, asking why she would pursue marriage after accusing him of serious wrongdoing.

Gatekeepers News reports that Okafor addressed the controversy at a news conference in Lagos, describing some claims as inconsistent and urging the public not to accept unverified online narratives.

The dispute between Okafor and Ogala began in late 2025 after a video of his engagement surfaced online, prompting the actress to claim they had a long‑term relationship that started in 2017 and that promises made to her were not kept.

Ogala’s public statements included assertions that the relationship contributed to the breakdown of her previous marriage and emotional distress following its end, and she demanded financial compensation for what she described as a breach of promise.

Okafor said he was puzzled by the combination of allegations and requests, highlighting what he described as contradictions in the narrative put forward by Ogala.

“The same person accusing me of murder is also saying I want to abandon her and marry another woman,” he said, rejecting the notion that he would be a suitable spouse under those circumstances. He accused some bloggers of amplifying the situation for online attention and called for responsible reporting.

The cleric also addressed other accusations involving his personal life, including claims from his ex‑wife and others, which he said were untrue and part of a broader attempt to damage his reputation and ministry. He said several of the allegations contained glaring lies and unanswered questions that would be clarified in due course.

This public defence comes amid wider debate online, including discussions of legal actions and media commentary, and has led to calls from Okafor for greater regulation of online conduct to protect individuals from reputational harm.