Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Nnamdi Kanu Files Contempt Charge Against DSS DG

Leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, has filed a contempt charge against the Director General of the Department of State Services (DSS), Yusuf Bichi for allegedly disobeying court orders.

Gatekeepers New reports that the claimant, through his lawyer, Aloy Ejimakor, on Monday filed Form 49 titled: “Notice to Show Cause Why An Order Of Committal Should Not Be Made,” at the Federal High Court in Abuja.

The application was marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/383/2015, dated and filed on June 10.

Federal Republic of Nigeria was listed as complainant/1st respondent, while Yusuf Magaji Bichi was listed as 2nd respondent/contemnor.

Kanu alleged that despite being served with the orders of Justice Binta Nyako of a FHC in Abuja on May 20, Bichi had refused to comply with the said orders.

Recall that Justice Nyako had, on May 20, declined to grant an application filed by Kanu to set aside his 2017 bail revocation after he was alledged to have jumped bail.

The judge also refused to transfer him to Kuje Correctional Centre or place him under house arrest as he had requested.

Justice Nyako, however, reviewed the conditions for visiting the IPOB leader at the DSS facility by his lawyers. She varied the visitation days from two to three days a week.

She then ordered that Kanu should be given a safe and clean room to prepare for his defence with his team of five counsel.

The judge also ordered that Kanu and his lawyers should be allowed such a facility that is required for the preparation of his defence and be allowed to take notes.

However, in the application filled in on Monday, Kanu alleged that the DSS DG had failed to abide by the court’s orders.

The application goes, “Take Notice that the Defendant will on the ____ day of _______, 2024, at the hour of 9 o’clock in the forenoon apply to this court for an order for your committal to prison for having disobeyed the order of this court made on the 20th day of May 2024, which stated in pertinent part as follows:”

“You have not complied with the 3 (three) days per week visitation to the Applicant as was ordered by the court.
“You have not provided a safe and ‘clean’ room to the Applicant at the present facility to prepare for his defense with his team of counsel.”

“You have not allowed such facility that is required for the preparation of the Applicant’s defence, which facility you have disallowed on every visitation since the said order was entered, as set out below:”

“Interdiction, seizure, perusal and photocopying of legal documents relating to the trial preparation of the Applicant.”

“By not retracing your steps after you were, on the 31st day of May 2024, served with a Form 48; Notice of Consequences of Disobedience to Court.”

“AND TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that you are hereby required to attend the court on the first-mentioned day to show cause why an Order for your Committal should not be made.”

You May Also Like